Why Israel is arming ISIS-linked gangs in Gaza
How occupation uses collaborators to sow chaos and death.
Earlier this month former Israeli defense minister Avigdor Lieberman confirmed that Israeli intelligence has been arming a criminal gang in the Gaza Strip led by a Palestinian named Yasser Abu Shabab.
The gang includes members who have been affiliated with ISIS, the extremist group also known as Islamic State.
This did not come as news to many Palestinians, who have pointed out that criminal gangs protected by Israeli forces have been looting aid trucks entering the Strip for many months – a fact reported by The Washington Post back in November.
Joining us on this episode of The Electronic Intifada Podcast to discuss the Yasser Abu Shebab gang and the wider issue of Israel’s attempt to recruit Palestinian collaborators is Muhammad Shehada.
A Palestinian analyst and writer from Gaza, Shehada is a visiting fellow with the European Council on Foreign Relations. He has closely tracked the emergence of the Abu Shabab gang and wrote a recent article for The New Arab explaining his findings.
In conversation with this writer and with The Electronic Intifada’s executive director Ali Abunimah, Shehada explains the nature of the gang and the strategy behind Israel’s support for it.
“Netanyahu chose what would be a perfect match for his own personal dilemma,” he explains, “criminals on the run from authority who know that if the genocide is over, they would end up in prison, just like him, and that’s what you have on your hands, basically a bunch of collaborators.”
The goal is to sow chaos and internal division within Palestinian society, as well as to prevent desperately needed aid from reaching the starving population through systemic looting, backed by Israeli military force.
As Shehada argues: “It’s a front, not even a proxy. It’s just a puppet … They’re used by Israel to do Israel’s own dirtiest actions and then pretend that they have nothing to do with it.”
Defeating Hamas?
According to one report in the Israeli media, Israeli intelligence officials are hoping that their backing of the gang could eventually “open the door to new governing alternatives” to Hamas.
Shehada expressed doubt on this in his article, writing that “branding these gangs as potential rivals to Hamas masks the very goal of why Israel created them in the first place. Around 300 untrained thieves, drug dealers, criminals and convicted murderers cannot overpower Hamas’s estimated 30,000 militants.”
According to Israeli news site Ynet, Lieberman actually violated Israel’s strict military censorship laws to publicize his claims – which were then mostly confirmed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Lieberman – a former political ally turned rival to Netanyahu – apparently exposed Israel’s arming of the Abu Shabab militia as a form of political point scoring. It is likely that he has an eye on the Israeli elections due in October 2026, but which could come sooner if ongoing efforts to topple Netanyahu’s coalition are successful.
Lieberman’s criticism is that the guns Israel is handing over to the militia will eventually be turned on Israel.
Watch the full episode in the video above or listen to the audio version on your favorite podcast platform.
Articles we discussed
“The rise of Abu Shabab: Mapping the Gaza militia armed by Israel,” Muhammad Shehada, The New Arab
“What’s wrong with that? How Israel trained and armed an ISIS-linked Gazan militia,” Yossi Melman, Haaretz
“Gangs and mercenaries” [Arabic], Suheil Kiwan, Arab48
Translation of Arab48 article by the Britain Palestine Media Centre.
Produced by Tamara Nassar.
Main image: Yasser Abu Shabab/Facebook.
Check back on this page at a later date for a full transcript.
Originally published by The Electronic Intifada.
I am promoting my campaign to be the new president and treasurer of all nonprofits, and then we are all going to stand up together and invoke the Declaration of Independence. We are taking back our consent to be governed by this corrupt government. Google me, Sassy Grace Woodruff, Nancy K Woodruff, Nancy k Sack.
Nonprofits are not owned by their creators. They are owned by the entire public as they are public corporations. When a nonprofit is breaking its bylaws, and they all are, then anyone of the public can call a vote for new leadership of any nonprofit. I am asking for all of them. I can hold two offices, president and treasurer, so that I have control of the money and can spend it as I please. If you see somebody who is hungry and you have the means to feed them and you don't do it your faith is dead. A nonprofit is only for humanitarian reasons and if they have any money in the bank and someone is hungry, they must feed them or they are breaking their bylaws.
Nonprofit means no money in the bank if someone is in need. A true nonprofit is capable of spending all the incoming money, so that it circles around and comes back. The Bible says every seven years the church must declare jubilee, which means no one owes debt anymore except for their property, and every third seven years which is 21 years they are debt-free including all property. I have never heard of a Jubilee ever taking place but that's what I plan to do when everyone chooses me to be the new president and treasurer of all those trillions and trillions of dollars.
Familiar nonprofits are Bill Gates's foundation, Warren Buffett's foundation, World Vision, Feed the Children, Red Cross, the Catholic Church, the Baptist Church, the Pentecostal church, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons, Islam's nonprofits, Salvation Army, Boys and Girls Clubs, Feeding America, United Way, UNICEF, American Heart Association, Goodwill, Rockefeller foundation, and so many more!
Once we are taking care of ourselves, there is absolutely nothing the government can do when we take back our consent to be governed, because that's what the Declaration of Independence tells us to do.
When, in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands, which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station, to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created, equal that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter, or to abolish it, and institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall see most likely to affect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more DISPOSED to SUFFER, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future Security.
Such has been the patient sufferance of the people of the United States, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of Government. The history of the US Presidents is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct objection the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the United States. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world.
The presidents have refused their assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
TIME TO ADD YOUR GRIEVANCES TO THE LIST THAT IS WAY LONGER THAN THEY HAD AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND. WE SHALL FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT WHERE ALL MEN AND WOMEN AND CHILDREN, REGARDLESS OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN, OR WHERE THEY CAME FROM SHALL BE EQUAL! Make life fair for all.
Look a rogue terror state is sponsoring terrorists. Quick America invade and bomb them into rubble. Oh wait. That’s your boy? Forget all about that humanitarian rules of law bullshit then.